Babylonian Talmud

Rodkinson 1918 — source 3, scan section 38

TRACT ERUBIN. 89 hold, that eight benedictions must be recited in the prayer and Beth Hillel only seven ? This question is not decided. Rabba said: " When I was at the college of R, Huna the question arose, whether the benediction of the time* should be recited in the New Year and Day of Atonement prayers. Shall we say, that because these holy days only come from time to time, the benediction of time should be made, or, because the Bible does not classify them as festivals, no such benediction need be made ? R. Huna could not answer the question but when I subsequently came to R. Jehudah's college, the latter said he made such a benediction even over a new pumpkin. I then said to him, that I did not question the right to pronounce this benediction over anything whatever, but I wished to know whether it was compulsory to do this on the New Year and the Day of Atonement. He then answered : Rabh and Samuel both said, that the benediction of time must be recited only for each of the three festivals." An objection was made : It is written [Ecclesiastes xi. 2] : " Give a portion to seven, and also to eight." R. Eliezer said that by " seven " is meant the seven days of the creation and by "eight" is meant the eight days of the circumcision. R. Jehoshua said: "By * seven * is meant the seven days of Pass- over, by ' eight ' is meant the eight days of the feast of Taber- nacles and by ' also ' is meant Pentecost, New Year and the Day of Atonement." May we not assume, that by this is meant, that the benediction of time must be pronounced on all these festivals ? Nay ; this simply means to state, that benedictions should be recited but no special benedictions are specified. It seems to us, that this is the correct explanation ; for the benedic- tion of time is certainly not recited on every one of the days of the festivals but only the first day. This is not the question, because the benediction of time must be recited in the course of the fes- tival ; if not on the first day, on the second and so on. At any event this benediction must be made over a goblet (of wine) ? Shall we assume, however, that the above is in support of the dictum of R, Na'hman, who holds that the benediction of time may be recited even in the market and without a goblet ? This is not the question either; for if a man does not recite this bene- * The full text of this benediction reads : " Blessed art Thou, Lord our God, King of the Universe, who hast allowed us to live and hast preserved us and hast allowed us to reach this time." 90 THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD. diction on one day, he may do so on the next when he might come across a goblet. This would be feasible where the three (main) festivals and New Year are concerned, but how would it be with the Day of Atonement ? What should the man do ? Should he pronounce the benediction over the goblet on the day preceding the Day of Atonement before dusk, he would then and there usher in the Day of Atonement, and as is well known, he must not eat or drink on that day. Should he pronounce the benediction and let the goblet stand until after the Day of Atone- ment ? Have we not learned that one must drink the contents of the goblet immediately after pronouncing the benediction; otherwise he must not make the benediction at all ? Should he pronounce the benediction and then give the goblet to a child ? In that case, there would be fear, lest the child be accustomed to drinking on that day, and will continue to do so when grown and therefore the Halakha according to R. A'hadoes not prevail. How, then, does the Halakha concerning the benediction of time on the New Year and the Day of Atonement prevail ? The Rabbis sent the elder R. Yeimar to R. Hisda with instructions to observe how the latter proceeded on the eve of the New Year, and then to return and report what he had seen. When R. Hisda saw R. Yeimar (and upon questioning him as to his mis- sion was told that he just called to see him) he said : If a wet piece of wood is lifted, it is obvious, that either the wood or its space is needed. (If thou camest thou certainly didst so with an object.) At about that time a goblet of wine was brought to R. Hisda and he pronounced the benediction of the day and also that of the time over it. The Halakha prevails, that the benediction of time must be recited on the New Year and on the Day of Atonement and the Halakha also prevails that if a man forgot to recite it and was reminded of his negligence even in the market, he may recite it then and there. Rabba said again: " When I was at the college of R. Huna, the question arose whether a young scholar, who fasted on the day preceding Sabbath must fast until night or in honor of the Sabbath break his fast earlier. R. Huna could not answer the question. I went to R. Jehudah and he could not answer this either." Said Rabha: " Let us see if we cannot decide this question ourselves from what we have learned in the following Boraitha: If the fast-day of the ninth of Abh fall on a Friday, bread may be brought to a man just before twilight of the size TRACT ERUBIN. 91 of an egg, and he should eat it, in order that he may not enter upon the observance of the Sabbath while still in pain." We have learned in a Boraitha: R. Jehudah said: It once happened that we were sitting before R. Aqiba on the fast of the ninth of Abh, which fell on a Friday, and just before dusk a soft- boiled egg was brought to him which he swallowed without even salting it, and not because he desired to eat it in that manner; but because he wished to show his disciples how the Halakha was carried out. R. Jose, however, said, that a man must fast through the entire day until dusk. R. Jose said to the sages: " Will ye not admit, that if the ninth of Abh fall on the day after Sabbath, a man must stop eating while it is yet day on Sabbath?" and they answered " Yea." " What difference is there then between entering in upon the observance of the Sabbath while still in pain and fin- ishing the Sabbath under the same conditions ?" asked R. Jose. They answered: " In the first instance he fasted all day; but in this instance he had been eating and drinking all day and was surely not in pain. " Finally, however, Ula said that the Halakha prevailed according to R. Jose. Do we then act according to the opinion of R. Jose ? Have we not learned, (concerning the Boraitha in Tract Taanith which teaches) that Rabbon Gamaliel said: " On a Friday the fast need not be completed," that upon the death of Rabbon Gamaliel, R. Jehoshua came and sought to nullify his decree and R. Johanan ben Nouri arose and declared: " We see that the body always follows the head. As long as Rabbon Gamaliel lived, we