Babylonian Talmud

Rodkinson 1918 — source 2, scan section 24

if it occur in the afternoon of Sabbath one may only save enough for one meal. R. Jose, however, says : ' ' One may at all times save enough for three meals." GEMARA: Let us see! Why should it only be allowed to save three meals, or two, or one ? (It says, further on, that the victuals for the meals are to be brought into such a place as is covered by an Erub. In such a place things may be carried, and the things themselves may also be handled, then why should one not be allowed to save more than enough for three meals ?) Said Rabha: Because a man is anxious for his possessions, he might, if allowed to save as much as possible, forget about the Sabbath and extinguish the fire altogether. Said Abayi to him: " We have learned previously, that a man upon whose roof a barrel filled with victuals becomes broken, may bring another vessel and put it underneath the barrel in order that the contents of the barrel fall into the vessel, but may not bring another barrel and transfer the contents of the broken one into the new, nor may he place a new barrel alongside of the other and remove the contents of the broken one into the new one by keeling over the former and letting its contents drop into the latter. Why should he not be allowed to do this ? (He is on private ground, and the barrel with its contents may be handled ?) If it is pro- hibited as a precautionary measure in the manner of the previ- ous case, where does the precaution arise ? " This latter case is also a precautionary measure ; for were he allowed to remove the contents from one barrel into another, there is fear of his carry- ing it through public ground. The text of the Boraitha, how- ever, teaches further, that if the man had guests in his house, he may remove the contents of the broken barrel into a new one, etc. But he may not first remove the contents and then call guests, but first call guests and then remove the things; nor may he pretend (to call guests), but must actually desire their 246 THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD. company. In the name of R. Jose bar R. Jehudah it was said, that even calling guests as a pretext is also allowed. The rabbis taught : If one had saved (from the fire) fine bread, he must not return and save coarse bread, but if he first saved the coarse he may return and save the fine. One may also save enough on the Day of Atonement in the event of a fire (when that day is succeeded by Sabbath) to last him through the Sabbath also, but on a Sabbath it is not permitted to save enough for the Day of Atonement (if the. Sabbath falls on the day before), and all the more so is it not allowed if the Sabbath precedes a feast-day ; nor is it allowed to save on one Sabbath for the following Sabbath. The rabbis taught: If one forgets bread in an oven, and in the meantime the Sabbath sets in, it is allowed to save enough bread to last for three meals ; and one may say to bystanders, " Come and take out as much as ye need " ; and when taking out the bread it should not be done with a baker's shovel, but with some other utensil. R. Hisda said : A man should see that every- thing should be prepared on Friday for the Sabbath as early as possible, as it is written [Exodus xvi. 5] : " And it shall come to pass, on the sixth day, when they prepare what they shall have brought in," etc., and this means, that as soon as the sixth day sets in, preparations for the Sabbath should be begun. R. Aba said: "A man must pronounce the benediction over two loaves on the Sabbath," for it is written [ibid. xvi. 5]: "Double bread." Said R. Ashi : " I noticed the manner in which R. Kahana did this : He would hold two loaves, but would cut only one, because it is written [ibid. xvi. 18]: * Every man according to his eating had he gathered.' " R. Zera used to cut off the loaf suflficient to last him for the entire meal. Asked Rabhina of R. Ashi: " Does this not seem gluttonous, to hold so large a piece in one's hand ? " Answered R. Ashi : " Because on week-days such was not his wont, it does not appear glutton- ous on Sabbath, and R. Zera did this only in honor of the day." R. Ami and R. Assi, if happening to have the same bread used in making an Erub, for use on Sabbath, would pronounce the benediction over the bread, for they said that because one relig- ious duty had been fulfilled with that bread, it should be used to fulfil another religious duty." How so : If a coyiflagration, ' ' etc. The rabbis taught : How many meals should a man eat on the Sabbath ? Three. R. 'Hidka said four. Said R. Johanan : Both the rabbis and R. TRACT SABBATH. 247 'Hidka adduced their opinions from the same passage, as fol- lows [Exodus xvi. 25]: " And Moses said, Eat it to-day; for a Sabbath is this day unto the Lord: to-day ye will not find it in the field." R. 'Hidka holds that, day being mentioned three times, three meals should be eaten during the day and one at night, and the rabbis hold that the day includes the night and only three meals are required. Our Mishna, however, which decrees that only enough for three meals should be saved, does therefore not agree with R. 'Hidka. According to whose opin- ion, however, will the following Mishna be ? (Tract Peah) : " If a poor man have sufficient for two meals, he must not apply for another at the public kitchen (where food is distributed), but he may apply to the general charity fund. If he have, however, sufficient for fourteen meals (for the week) he must not even apply to the general charity fund! " If the Mishna were of the opinion of R. 'Hidka, he should have had sufficient for sixteen meals, so as to afford him four meals on the Sabbath, and, according to the rabbis, for fifteen meals in order to have three meals on the Sabbath ? It is therefore neither in accord with R. 'Hidka nor with the rabbis. Nay; it is in accord with the rabbis, and the poor man should eat his Sabbath-night meal on the Sabbath day, so with his Friday-night meal it will make three meals on the Sabbath. It may also be said that the Mishna holds with R. 'Hidka, and that the poor man should leave his Friday meal for the Sabbath. Shall we make the poor man then fast on Friday ? It would therefore be better to hold the Mishna's opinion to be in accord with R. Aqiba, who says, that the poor man should make Sabbath equal to a week- day in order not to be forced to rely upon charity. Thus four- teen meals are sufficient, and he may eat only two on Sabbath. But according to whose opinion is the Mishna (Tract Peah) : " If a wandering mendicant come to a town, he must be given a loaf which can be bought for a Pundian (one forty-eighth of a Sela) when the price of flour is one Sela for four Saahs (and the sages calculated that such a loaf is sufficient for two meals). If