Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Apocalypse of Zephaniah
Apocalypse of Zephaniah — James 1920 quotation and fragment discussion
Unverified edition · Scanned section 91
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Ancient source language(s)
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Scanned section 91 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
James1920 historical fragment dossier, printedpage 73
TIM': f)I.I) TICSTAMICNT 73 from an account of a progress tlirough the seven heavens, such as we have in the Ascciisiu)i of Isaiah, the Tcstamoit of Levi, the (ircek Bariich Apocalypse, and the Secrets of Enoch. Each heaven, it is indicated, is inhabited by a different order of angels : the Lords (/vi'pi(m;rffr, dominations, of St. Paul) arc in the fifth. The i)assage does not exactly coincide with any other description : there is, indeed, nothing very distinctive about it except the mention of the Lords. Yet it does tell us something of the nature of the book whence it is taken. We have also an Apocalypse of Zephaniah in a frag- mentary state in two Egyptian dialects, Achmimic and Sahidic. The larger piece is in Achmimic : of the Sahidic there is but one leaf. The editor, Steindorff, calls the Achmimic an " anonymous Apocalypse" ; it is true that the name of Zephaniah does not occur in it (as it does in the Sahidic), but the coincidences of language between the two are numerous, and I believe it is the settled conviction of most who have studied the book (it is certainly my own) that the Achmimic is part of the same text as the Sahidic. In neither of them does Clement's extract occur. But the text is very strangely dislocated and incoherent, and one is tempted to believe that the pages of the Greek manuscript which the translator was using were not in the right order. Whether that is so or not, the Egyptian version cannot represent the original very faithfully. The main points of the longer fragment are these. It begins with a badly mutilated passage which I interpret as a vision of a deathbed of a righteous man (like that in the Apocalypse of Paul). Then, in company with an angel, the seer goes through a city and beholds two men walking together, two women grinding to- gether, and one on a bed (cf. Lc. xvii. 34-36 : what happens to them we do not learn). The whole earth is seen like a single drop of water. Something is then said of a vision of torment. Next he is taken to Mount Seir, and sees the three wicked sons of the priest
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: James1920 printed72–74: one definite Clementquotation concerning fifthheaven and James’s discussion/summary of fragmentary Coptic texts attributed toZephaniah. Identity between Clement’s book and the Coptic fragments is explicitly uncertain in the retained source. Not a complete ancientbook, original Coptic edition or a modern translation of all discovered fragments; unrelatedZechariah excluded. All sourcewording, quotedlacunae and uncertainOCR retained withoutrepair.. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
3 chapter/reading unit(s) · 3 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Scanned section 90 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 91 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 92 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.