Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Mesha Stele
Scanned section 86
Reading display
Text size, spacing, and the sepia or night theme stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Sayce1892 historical source page 86
jS THE MOABITE STONE. * the wall of the forest.' The form Kir-haraseth is also used in the Book of Kings. The story told by the Stone and the account of the war against Moab given in the Bible supplement one another. Dr. Ginsburg has suggested that the deliverance of Moab from Israel was brought about during the reign of Ahaziah, the successor of Ahab, and that Joram, the successor of Ahaziah, was subsequently driven out of Jahaz, which lay on the southern side of the Arnon ; but that after this the tide of fortune turned, Joram summoned his allies from Judah and Edom, ravaged Moab, and block- aded Mesha in his capital of Kirkha. Then came the sacrifice by Mesha of his eldest son on the wall of Kirkha, so that * there was great indignation against Israel,' and the allied forces retreated back ' to their own land.' The Moabite Stone shows us what were the forms of the Phoenician letters used on the eastern side of the Jordan in the time of Ahab. The forms employed in Israel and Judah on the western side could not have differed much ; and we may therefore see in these vene- rable characters the precise mode of writing employed by the earlier prophets of the Old Testament. This knowledge is of great importance for the correction and restoration of corrupt passages, and more especially of proper names, the spelling of which has been deformed by copyists. Just, however, as the writing of two persons at the present day must differ, so also the writing of two nations like the Moabites and Jews must have differed to some extent. Moreover, there must have been some distinction between the more cursive writing of a papy- rus-roll and the carefully cut letters of a public monument like that of Mesha. Indeed, that such a distinction did
Study this passage
Scanned section 86 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
About this edition
Mesha Stele — Sayce1892 English translation and notes
Unverified edition
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Ancient source language
Recorded completeness: Complete supplied historical English Mesha/MoabiteStone translation and surrounding source discussion, sourceprintedpp71–79. Source explicitly acknowledges irrecoverablylost final inscription lines; these are not reconstructed. Plate caption/blankimageobject excluded, rawsource retained. No ancient Moabite Unicode original or modern emendation claimed.. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
9 chapter/reading unit(s) · 9 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Scanned section 77 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 78 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 79 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 80 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 83 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 84 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 85 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 86 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 87 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.