Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Prayer of Joseph
Prayer of Joseph — James 1920 preserved fragments and notes
Unverified edition · Scanned section 49
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Greek fragments
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Scanned section 49 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
James1920 fragment dossier, printedpage 31
THE OLD TESTAMENT 31 the Prayer of Joseph knew something of Christian theology and indulged in some side-hits at it. Whether that was the main object of the book we cannot tell; but Origen treats it with such respect that I think its attack on Christianity cannot have been very overt. In the Journal of Theological Studies, xx. (1918) p. 20, Mr. Vacher Burch advocates the view that the Praver was pro-Christian, and based on the primitive Testiuuniia against the Jews. " The chief theme of the fragments ... is the surpassing of one angel- appearance of the Christ by another — of Uriel by Israel." It is now known that Uriel was a Testimony hypostasis of this nature, for the Ethiopic Narrative of St. Clement (Budge, Contendings of the Apostles, ii 479) contains this helpful passage : " And I (Peter) gave them com- mandments concerning circumcision according to the Law of Moses, and God (/. e. Christ) appeared unto me in the form of the Angel Uriel, and commanded me to do away the Old Law and to bring in the New." He refers also to the fact that Justin Martyr makes Jacob and Israel names of Christ. I cannot reproduce the whole of the passage here : the thesis is to me uncon- vincing at present. It is obscurely put by Mr. Burch, and needs restatement in an expanded form to make it plausible, or indeed intelligible. See further under Hezekiah.
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: Surviving Origen quotations and the complete James1920historical discussion, printed21–31. This is a fragment dossier, not the lost1100linecompletePrayer. Retains identification, uncertain allusions and differences between ancient quotations and James’s discussion. HistoricalEnglishwording, quoted source uncertainty, lacunae, Greek/LatinOCR and notes are retained without conjectural spelling repair. Exact chapter-boundary portions selected; no adjacent work is relabelled.. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
11 chapter/reading unit(s) · 11 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Scanned section 39 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 40 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 41 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 42 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 43 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 44 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 45 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 46 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 47 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 48 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 49 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.