Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Apocryphal New Testament — Historical English Collection
Historical public-domain English edition — retained OCR sections
Unverified edition · Chapter 7
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): English
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Chapter 7 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
Apocryphal New Testament — Hone/Wake/Jones — Section 7
It is scarcely necessary to tell the reader, that in 1516 and 1519 Erasmus published his first and second editions of the Greek Testament, .both of which omitted the three heavenly witnesses. That having promised to insert them in his text, if they were found iu a single Greek MS. ; he was soon informed of the existence of such a MS. in England, and consequently inserted 1 John, v. 7, in his third edition, 1522. That this MS,, after a profound sleep of two centuries, has at last been found in the library of Trinity College, Dublin. That the Complutensian edition, which was not published till 1522, though it professes to be printed in 1514, has the seventh and eighth verses patched up from the modern Latin MS., and the final clause of the eighth verse, which is omitted in its proper place, trans- ferred to the end of the seventh. That Colinseus, in 1534, omitted the verse on the faith of MS. That R. Stephens, in his famous edition of 1550, inserted the verse, and marked the words ev tuc ovpavut as wanting in seven MSS. That Beza, suspecting no mistake, concluded that these seven MSS- contained the rest of the seventh verse, and the eighth with the words ev tt]l yrji* Sir Isaac Newton wrote a Dissertation upon this passage, wherein he gave a clear, exact, and comprehensive view of the whole question, and wherein he says, that when the adversaries of Erasmus had got the date.f
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
74 chapter/reading unit(s) · 74 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Chapter 1 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 2 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 3 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 4 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 5 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 6 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 7 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 8 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 9 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 10 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 11 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 12 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 13 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 14 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 15 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 16 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 17 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 18 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 19 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 20 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 21 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 22 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 23 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 24 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 25 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 26 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 27 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 28 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 29 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 30 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 31 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 32 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 33 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 34 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 35 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 36 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 37 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 38 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 39 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 40 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 41 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 42 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 43 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 44 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 45 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 46 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 47 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 48 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 49 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 50 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 51 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 52 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 53 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 54 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 55 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 56 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 57 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 58 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 59 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 60 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 61 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 62 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 63 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 64 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 65 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 66 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 67 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 68 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 69 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 70 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 71 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 72 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 73 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 74 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.