Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Pistis Sophia
G. R. S. Mead 1896 — retained OCR sections
Unverified edition · Chapter 32
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Ancient source language(s)
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Chapter 32 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
Pistis Sophia — G. R. S. Mead — Section 32
Woide not only carefully copied the whole of the MS. but also the Codex Brucianus at Oxford. He gives the date of the MS. as about the fourth century, and considers the writer to have been Valentinus. He, however, published no work on the subject. e. 1812. Miinter (F.). Odas GnosticEe Salomoni Tiibutee, The- baice et Latine, Prefatione et Adnotationibiis Philo- logicis Illustratfe (Hafnise). Bishop Miinter, a learned Dane, probably got his text from Woide's copy ; his brief pamphlet is of no particular importance, nevertheless it was solely upon these few brief selections, the seven Odes of Solomon, that, with the ex- ception of Dulaurier, scholars formed their opinion of the Pistis Sophia up to the time of the publication of Schwartze's work in 1851. Miinter believes that the original treatise belongs to the second century. /. 1843. Matter (J.). Histoire Critique du Gnosticisme et de son Influence zur les Sectes religieuses et philosophiques des six premiers Siecles de I'Ere chretienne (Paris) — 2nd ed. 11. 41 sq., 350 sq. The first edition appeared iu 1828 and contains no reference to P. S. In Dor- ner's German translation the references are, 11. 69 sq. and 163 sq. Matter rejects the idea of Valentinus, but he had no acquaintance whatever with the text and bases himself entirely on Woide. He states that the MS. can scarcely be prior to the fourth century, and (p. 352) places the date of the original treatise between the end of the second and the end of the fifth. He gives no opinion as to the school to which it belongs. g. 1838. Dulaurier (E). Article in the Moniteur (27th Sept.). h. 1847. Dulaurier. Article in the Journal Asiatlque, Quatrleme Serle, Tome Ix., juln, pp. 534-548 ; entitled " Notice XXXVlll INTRODUCTION. sur le Manuscript copte-thebain, intitule La Fidele Sagesse ; et sur la Publication projetee Ju Texte et (le la Traduction fran^'aise de ce Manuscript."
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
66 chapter/reading unit(s) · 66 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Chapter 1 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 2 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 3 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 4 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 5 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 6 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 7 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 8 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 9 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 10 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 11 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 12 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 13 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 14 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 15 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 16 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 17 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 18 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 19 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 20 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 21 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 22 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 23 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 24 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 25 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 26 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 27 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 28 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 29 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 30 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 31 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 32 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 33 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 34 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 35 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 36 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 37 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 38 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 39 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 40 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 41 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 42 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 43 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 44 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 45 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 46 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 47 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 48 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 49 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 50 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 51 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 52 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 53 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 54 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 55 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 56 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 57 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 58 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 59 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 60 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 61 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 62 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 63 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 64 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 65 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 66 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.