Skip to main content
Helpful SaintsFaith · Service · Compassion
Scripture tools

Helpful Saints Corpus Reader

Pistis Sophia

G. R. S. Mead 1896 — retained OCR sections

Unverified edition · Chapter 27

Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Ancient source language(s)

Chapter 27 · All reading sections
Choose an edition

Pistis Sophia — G. R. S. Mead — Section 27

Some twenty leaves at least are missing, and even when Bruce fonnd it it was in a very dilapidated condition. It was further injured by neglect and damp in the Bodleian, when Woide found it and carefully copied it. Woide considered that it was the Egyptian form of the Pistis Sophia written by Valentinus in Coptic. It is, how- ever, evidently a translation like the Pistis Sophia from the Greek, and like the Pistis Sophia is crammed full of the Greek original technical terms. Schwartze also copied it. In 1891 Amelineau published a text and a French translation at Paris, and in 1892 Schmidt published a text and a German translation at Leipzig. Schmidt has sorted out this puzzling chaos of leaves with the following results : The Codex consists of tw^o treatises quite distinct in matter and character. The first is divided into two parts, the two Books of leou, under the general title, The Book of the Great Logos according to the Mystery [? of leou]. The second treatise has no title, and is followed by a long Hymn to the Gnosis, also without title. The First Book of leou opens with the title, " This is the Book of the Know- ledge of the Invisible God." One thing is abundantly clear on every page, namely, that we are dealing with a MS. which contains the ideas of the same school as that to which the Pistis Sophia and the Books of the Saviour belong. In fact, the longer Extract from the Books of the Saviour practically gives the same account of the three baptisms as that found in far greater fulness in the Codex Brucianus. Whether or not the Extracts from the Books of the Saviour appended to the MS. of the Pistis Sophia belong to the missing portions of the Codex Brucianus, or whether the translator from the Greek abridged some portion of the Books of leou to give his readers an idea of these books to w^hich the text of the Pistis Sophia had just made reference, it is impossible to say ; this much is certain, that the Books of the Saviour and the treatises of INTRODUCTION. XXXlll

Study this passage
Prepare a passage questionPassage ID & source detailsWhere did this come from?External AI use is not authorized for this edition. Reading, comparison and citations remain available.
Compare this section in another edition

Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.

Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.

About this edition

Recorded completeness: Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED. Available reading sections are listed below.

Available body coverage · eng

66 chapter/reading unit(s) · 66 nonempty passage record(s).

Supported chapters & passages
  • Chapter 1 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 2 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 3 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 4 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 5 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 6 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 7 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 8 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 9 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 10 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 11 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 12 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 13 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 14 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 15 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 16 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 17 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 18 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 19 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 20 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 21 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 22 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 23 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 24 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 25 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 26 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 27 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 28 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 29 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 30 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 31 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 32 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 33 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 34 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 35 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 36 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 37 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 38 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 39 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 40 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 41 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 42 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 43 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 44 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 45 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 46 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 47 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 48 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 49 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 50 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 51 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 52 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 53 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 54 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 55 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 56 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 57 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 58 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 59 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 60 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 61 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 62 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 63 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 64 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 65 · 1 passage record(s)
  • Chapter 66 · 1 passage record(s)

Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.

Scripture FirstSources ClassifiedEvidence VisibleCounterpoints PreservedMember Research PrivateAI Never Claims Divine Authority

Evidence Intelligence

Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.

Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.
Primary

Direct Biblical Text

The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.

Primary Support

Original-Language Evidence

Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.

Comparative

Ancient Witness

Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.

Contextual

Historical Context

Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.

Interpretive

Research Model

A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.

Unresolved

Open Question

Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.

Message Helpful Saints

Helpful Saints · Research across the site

Search & explore

Choose a topic, or search the site.