Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Pistis Sophia
G. R. S. Mead 1896 — retained OCR sections
Unverified edition · Chapter 16
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Ancient source language(s)
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Chapter 16 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
Pistis Sophia — G. R. S. Mead — Section 16
Sidra Adma or The Book of Adam. The text, in a strange Chaldteo-Syriac idiom, was first published at Lund (1815, 1816), by Matth. Norberg, the learned Swede, together with a vocabulary and a Latin translation, in four quarto volumes. There is also a French translation by F. Tempes- tini in Migne's Dictionuaire des Apocryphes (1856). Compare also the thesis, Stellse Nasarteorum Ji^ones ex Sacro Gentis Codice, by Olof Svanander, presumably a pupil of Norberg (Lund, 1811). Finally we may mention the ^Ethiopic Enochian litera- ture. In 1773 Bruce brought back from Abyssinia three copies of the yEthiopic version of The Book of Enoch. Archbishop Laurence issued a translation in 1821 (2nd ed., 1833 ; 3rd, 1838), under the title The Book of Enoch. Hoflfman published a German translation, Das Buch Henoch (Jena, 1838), Gfrorer a Latin version of no value (Stuggart, 1840) ; Dillmann a critical text and also a German version (Leipzig, 1851; 2nd ed., 1853); Migne's Dictionuaire des Apocryphes (1856) contains an anonymous French transla- tion ; there is also an anonymous reprint of Laurence's translation, with a controversial introduction (London, 1883); and finally Charles recently (1893) published an English translation from Dillmann's text. This year Charles has also published The Book of the Secrets of Enoch (Oxford), a translation from Slavonic, which presents us with a new tradition entirely, namely, the Slavonic Enoch, from a Greek original which he places from B.C. 30 to a.d. 70, the Greek having in its turn a Hebrew background of a still earlier date. In an Appendix is a translation from the Slavonic of a fragment of Melchisedecian literature. For more than 1200 years this version of Enoch has been unknown save in Russia, and in Western Europe was not known to exist even in Russia till 1892. Outside of apocryphal scriptures and the world-bibles, these are all the documents connected directly or indirectly with the Gnosis, which, to my knowledge, we possess ; and, in spite of the good work that has been done since 1850, XXll INTRODUCTION.
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
66 chapter/reading unit(s) · 66 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Chapter 1 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 2 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 3 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 4 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 5 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 6 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 7 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 8 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 9 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 10 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 11 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 12 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 13 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 14 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 15 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 16 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 17 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 18 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 19 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 20 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 21 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 22 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 23 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 24 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 25 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 26 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 27 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 28 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 29 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 30 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 31 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 32 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 33 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 34 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 35 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 36 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 37 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 38 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 39 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 40 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 41 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 42 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 43 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 44 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 45 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 46 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 47 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 48 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 49 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 50 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 51 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 52 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 53 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 54 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 55 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 56 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 57 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 58 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 59 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 60 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 61 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 62 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 63 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 64 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 65 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 66 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.