Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Pistis Sophia
G. R. S. Mead 1896 — retained OCR sections
Unverified edition · Chapter 14
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Ancient source language(s)
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Chapter 14 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
Pistis Sophia — G. R. S. Mead — Section 14
erroneously attributing it to Origen. Further research, however, demonstrated beyond a doubt that the autlior was Hippolytus Romauus, Bishop of Ostia, in the first quarter of the third century. (See Bunsen, Hippolytus and His Age, 1852; Dollinger, Hippolytus und Kallistus, 1853, of which there is an English translation by Plummer ; and Words- worth, St. Hippolytus and the Church of Rome, 1880, 2nd ed.) As this treatise, entitled Philosophumena or the Refu- tation of all Heresies, is by far the most important work on Gnosticism from the pen of any Church Father, owing to its lengthy quotations from original Gnostic documents, it may be useful to state here that in 1859 Duncker, after Schneidewin's death, edited and published his colleague's excellent text and moderate Latin translation at Gottingen ; in 1860 Cruice published a less reliable text and Latin translation at Paris ; and that the English reader will find a passable translation by J. H. Macmahou in the Ante- Nicene Christian Library entitled The Writings of Hippo- lytus, vol. i., 1868. Curiously enough it was in the same year in which the text of the Philosophumena was published, 1851, that our present document, Pistis Sophia, was first brought into general notice. Of Gnostic works that have come down to us, undoubtedly the most valuable is the Coptic codex, of which we are treating in the present work. In fact, the only other im- portant relic of the Gnosis w^hich is so far known to have withstood the ravages of time and escaped the destruction of Christian and Mohammedan vandalism, is the Coptic papyrus, known as the Codex Brucianus and preserved in the Bodleian at Oxford, to which reference will be made later on. In the same library there is also another Coptic MS., a small quarto of 236 pages, entitled Treatise on the Mysteries of the Greek Letters, to which an Arabic translation is appended. The author was a priest called Atasius, who, somewhat in the fashion of the Gnostic doctor Marcus, deduces from the form of the letters of the Greek alphabet XX INTRODUCTION.
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
66 chapter/reading unit(s) · 66 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Chapter 1 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 2 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 3 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 4 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 5 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 6 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 7 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 8 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 9 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 10 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 11 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 12 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 13 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 14 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 15 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 16 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 17 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 18 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 19 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 20 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 21 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 22 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 23 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 24 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 25 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 26 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 27 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 28 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 29 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 30 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 31 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 32 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 33 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 34 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 35 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 36 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 37 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 38 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 39 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 40 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 41 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 42 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 43 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 44 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 45 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 46 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 47 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 48 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 49 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 50 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 51 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 52 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 53 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 54 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 55 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 56 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 57 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 58 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 59 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 60 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 61 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 62 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 63 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 64 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 65 · 1 passage record(s)
- Chapter 66 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.