Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. II — Section 616
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. II
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_cc3ee230-4735-42e7-b067-e1a5d1e931b2This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. II
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
ΑΒ, Bodleian Library, Oxford, No. δ. 30 (thirteenth century). Only five Testaments are found in this MS., and in the following order: Simeon (folio 1685), Levi (173%), Joseph (183°), Benjamin (195°), Judah (202%). The MS. is written in two or more hands (latest eighteenth century), and there are two types of text. Fortunately the four first-mentioned Testaments and T. Judah i-xiv. 8°» 9 (i.e. ἐὰν... αἰσχρορημονεῖν) belong to the first recension, and only T. Jud. xiv. 8¢°-xxvi, to the second. This MS. thus attests the same type of text as A*?, but it is more closely related to A* than to …
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.