Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. II — Section 1245
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. II
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_1a2fe5db-a852-4bd3-9897-059a289cbcdaThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. II
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
An abundance of resemblances in thought or diction has been pointed out in the notes on the text. One or two examples may be given here: in 4 Ezra vii. 88 the body is called chs corruptible vessel; cf. 1 Cor. xv. 53 this corruptible; in 4 Ezra ix. 37 the Law, it is said, perishes not but abides in its glory (i.e. the Law is heavenly and divine); cf. Rom. vii. 14 (the Law is spiritual), 2 Cor. iii. 7 f., &c., &c. The close parallels in thought as to the origin and prevalence of sin between S and St. Paul have already been pointed out in § 10 (1). 1 For the affinities of the Book …
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.