Nicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 04 — [766] geneton.

The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.

Work: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Volume 4

Passage referenceNicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 04 — [766] geneton.

Permanent passage identifier

hsu_d2ba6f18-e412-4ff1-b8a5-8de4c804ce2f

This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series Vol. 4

Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.

[767] The party he is writing against is the Acacian, of whom he does not seem to have had much distinct knowledge. He contrasts them again and again in the passages which follow with the Eusebians of the Nicene Council, and says that he is sure that the ground they take when examined will be found substantially the same as the Eusebian. vid. §6 init. et alib. §7. init. §9. circ. fin. §10. circ. fin. §13. init. tote kai nun. §18. circ. fin. §28. fin [On Acacius see Prolegg. ch. ii. §8 (2) b.] [768] propinontes vid. de Syn. §14. [769] James i. 8. [770] Hermas, Mand. ix., who is speaki…

Source: Christian Classics Ethereal Library — NPNF2-04 UTF-8 text
Rights: Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
Reading language: English
Completeness: Not established for this edition
Review: Review status not established by this card

Read in Scripture Library Prepare a passage question Open source

Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.

Scripture FirstSources ClassifiedEvidence VisibleCounterpoints PreservedMember Research PrivateAI Never Claims Divine Authority

Evidence Intelligence

Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.

Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.

Primary

Direct Biblical Text

The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.

Primary Support

Original-Language Evidence

Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.

Comparative

Ancient Witness

Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.

Contextual

Historical Context

Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.

Interpretive

Research Model

A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.

Unresolved

Open Question

Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.