Nicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 04 — [1999] §20, note 5.

The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.

Work: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Volume 4

Passage referenceNicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 04 — [1999] §20, note 5.

Permanent passage identifier

hsu_cd968004-e276-4d40-bbf2-d3a8535704d0

This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series Vol. 4

Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.

[2000] De Syn. §18, infr. ii. 37. [2001] 1 Cor. i. 24. [2002] Gal. v. 15. [2003] De Syn. 9, note 2. [2004] The passage which follows is written with his de Decr. before him. At first he but uses the same topics, but presently he incorporates into this Discourse an actual portion of his former work, with only such alterations as an author commonly makes in transcribing. This, which is not unfrequent with Athan., shews us the care with which he made his doctrinal statements, though they seem at first sight written off. It also accounts for the diffuseness and repetition which might be…

Source: Christian Classics Ethereal Library — NPNF2-04 UTF-8 text
Rights: Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
Reading language: English
Completeness: Not established for this edition
Review: Review status not established by this card

Read in Scripture Library Prepare a passage question Open source

Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.

Scripture FirstSources ClassifiedEvidence VisibleCounterpoints PreservedMember Research PrivateAI Never Claims Divine Authority

Evidence Intelligence

Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.

Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.

Primary

Direct Biblical Text

The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.

Primary Support

Original-Language Evidence

Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.

Comparative

Ancient Witness

Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.

Contextual

Historical Context

Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.

Interpretive

Research Model

A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.

Unresolved

Open Question

Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.