Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 418

The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.

Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I

Passage referenceCharles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 418

Permanent passage identifier

hsu_fe169fb6-bbb7-468f-8d15-e6c005dd4259

This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.

R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I

Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.

(δ) It is at least evident that the forms of the proper names in i. 1f. are the proper and usual Greek equivalents of Hebrew names, not the unfortunate results of misreadings of a Semitic script. See notes ad loc. (c) Néldeke points out (of. cé¢., p. 60) that there is a considerable difference between the Greek style of our book and that of the translations of Judith and 1 Maccabees. Noldeke, however, bases his arguments on RY instead of the original RS‘, to which this objection does not apply to the -same extent. 2. Evidence slightly in favour of a Semitic original, but not necessarily…

Source: R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
Rights: Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
Reading language: English
Completeness: Not established for this edition
Review: Review status not established by this card

Read in Scripture Library Prepare a passage question Open source

Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.

Scripture FirstSources ClassifiedEvidence VisibleCounterpoints PreservedMember Research PrivateAI Never Claims Divine Authority

Evidence Intelligence

Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.

Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.

Primary

Direct Biblical Text

The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.

Primary Support

Original-Language Evidence

Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.

Comparative

Ancient Witness

Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.

Contextual

Historical Context

Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.

Interpretive

Research Model

A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.

Unresolved

Open Question

Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.