Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 1026
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_d6baf669-e2d5-4141-8a08-c0e445bf256dThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
thus restoring the right order xiii. 24, 25, xiili. 1 w-w ® (feat damaged) can be read: yous don ibs Pil (3) mg. yrows): (ἃ ev πάσαις xpecas και παντα ὑπακουει (but & places καὶ at beginning = WB: so Sah): 5. implies same text, but paraphrases πὶ So 3) (fext): Ge (misunderstanding) ‘All things are double one against another’ (ravra δισσα εν κατεναντι τοῦ evos): SoS (reading Dw for ® ow) Y-Y (ἃ exduvov (B), ελλιπὸν (A): 3 aliquid deesse : ® ..w read ww by Levi, Peters*(= ‘He hath not made one of them in vain’). Smend restores [WRw po 2:2 35 (mg. 3) 121 abn mr by ar: G mexactly ‘One thi…
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.