Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 552
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_ae0887f8-cd1c-4841-b2ee-68fcc9c1aa85This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
+ apprehendit illum et (+salutans a) osculatus est (+ et y) Sarram (+ filiam suam a) et aBy pwn pad san nnd ArM Σ.]} > BA 106, 107 aBy τ. θυγ. avt.| αὐτὴ θυγατερ 106, 107 af __illi y >F Yr. προς] τιμα ΒΑ 106,107 SaBy Ar MF -ἼΝΟΜ tov πενθ, °! Tous 7. σου (ov sup. ras. (seg. ras. I Lit.) Al) BA +k. my 7. σ. τού, 107 SaBy Ar MF ore avo... yovets o.| aut. vuv yor. σ. εἰσιν BA aBy ore aut. o. γον. avo τ. ν. εἰσι 106, 107 S > M απ. τ. ν.] MN Ar ws οἱ γενν. σε] > BA AY ME καθὼς ημεθα np. 106, 107 S_ pr. (post ws) pater tuus et mater tuus 3» Bad. ... θυγ.] > BAF β. υγιαινουσα 106, …
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.