Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 36

The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.

Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I

Passage referenceCharles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 36

Permanent passage identifier

hsu_a2dc2bbb-9217-4eb8-a34c-5942a893ecb6

This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.

R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I

Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.

* Modern criticism is influenced by the radical conclusions of W. H. Kosters and the forcible defence by E. Meyer (Entstehung) whose own position, however, is in many respects opposed to the purely traditional ; see 8. R. Driver, Lit. 552 (and on the introductory literary questions, ib. 544 seqq.). A striking advance has recently been made by Torrey (Z2ra Studies), to whose work the present writer gratefully records his indebtedness, and since reasons are given in these pages for adopting certain radical conclusions of Kosters, Torrey, and others, it may be well to refer readers to the wr…

Source: R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
Rights: Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
Reading language: English
Completeness: Not established for this edition
Review: Review status not established by this card

Read in Scripture Library Prepare a passage question Open source

Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.

Scripture FirstSources ClassifiedEvidence VisibleCounterpoints PreservedMember Research PrivateAI Never Claims Divine Authority

Evidence Intelligence

Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.

Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.

Primary

Direct Biblical Text

The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.

Primary Support

Original-Language Evidence

Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.

Comparative

Ancient Witness

Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.

Contextual

Historical Context

Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.

Interpretive

Research Model

A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.

Unresolved

Open Question

Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.