Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 558
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_6b471575-dfc4-476d-b64d-ab91d4b89a5dThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
κιθος ΘΟ > 44, 106, 107 x.6°| > BALMF σου] > BAaBy MF θυγατερ 29] > BALMF εὐλογημενος 1} > BAM ἽΠ᾽3 72m) F omar, σου] +x. pytnp cov N°* BA 44, τού, τοῦ! >M k. eur, es ς Ouyarep 4° | >BAMF T. 0 VLOS pov | ov, p. T. 44, τοῦ; 107) > MF Κι Ἐν T. NED. « » « Nw. | > Ar 12, 13. τὰ λευκώματα isto be restored after χερσὶν αὐτοῦ (from ay). WD alone states that Tobit held his father guasz dimidiam fere horam and that the peelings were guasi membrana ovi. i 14. The second reference to the angels (which occasioned the insertion of ἐφ᾽ ἡμᾶς x.) in δὲ is a mere repetition from…
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.