Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 1096
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_587b2ac6-7e24-4c4e-a8e4-7ddf384c9ef4This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
was Elisha filled... Cp. 2 Kings ii. 9, 13. ho ; ᾿ In double measure... Cp. 2 Kings ii. 9, 20-22. Peters thinks that the omission of these two lines in & (see critical note) may be due to the fact that they seem to give more honour to Elisha than to Elijah; the omission may, however, be merely due to an oversight. Allhis days... Cp. 2 Kings iii. 13-15, vi. 15, 16, 30 ff. ; moved. Cp. Esther v. 9, ‘... that he stood not up nor moved for him.’ 501 SIRACH. 48. 13-138 13 Nothing was “too wonderful for him’, zz And *from his grave® his flesh ** prophesied”, 14 In® his life he did wond…
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.