Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 568
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_53b0ea44-96e4-4c1f-8af2-b62fda2140caThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
vpas| nu. BA 44, 106, 107 em] εν BA 44,106,107 ob 3» υμων] nu. BA 44, 106, 107 mart. up. | παλιν BA 44,106,107 5 >F ελεησ.] + payed) oven ΠΥΊΠΝΣ Fo x. συνάξει nuas BA 44, 106, 107 SaB ὁπου αν] ov eav BA ov 44, 106, το7 ubicumque 9 διασκορπισθητε] σκορπ. ΒΒ eaxopmadnre A διεσκορπισθῆμεν 44, τού, τοῦ S dispersi fueritis 3» 6. alter F οταν] εαν BA 44, τού, 107 k1°, . . ὑμῶν δ > & 22. ἐξομολ. (Cod. Vat.) cf. Th. Gram., p. 199. XIII. 3. ὅτι may be an error for οὗ or, as it is common to all recensions, a mistranslation of WN (Miiller, of. czz., D2 33) N. 1): al a : bi 6-108, N's lac…
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.