Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 330
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_4ac6e1fa-6957-4e2e-84c1-13e042f79b10This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
9 kind of plot against the local Jews, he attacked them also by night, and set fire to the haven and ~ the fleet, so that the glare of the light was seen at Jerusalem, two hundred and forty furlongs distant. 1o Nowwhen they had drawn off nine furlongs from thence, on their march against Timotheus, they 11 were attacked by no fewer than five thousand Arabs, with five hundred horsemen, and a stiff fight — was waged in which, by God’s help, Judas and his men won the victory. The vanquished nomads ~ besought Judas to be their friend, promising to give him cattle and to be of service in other …
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.