Charles — Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha Vol. I — Section 250
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament — Vol. I
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_2818afd1-cd0a-4e56-ae2e-8927d29e3627This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
R. H. Charles ed. 1913, Vol. I
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
therefore, be that the Syriac Version has retained the original reading, ‘a prince of Israel,’ Sy Ww); the Hebrew script in use before the square characters were introduced might easily account for reading an m (!9) for the second s (Ὁ); the translator, who was obviously puzzled, may also have taken exception, through ignorance, to the repeated "Ww. was promulgated by us. See critical note. 29. Joarib. Cp. ii. 1. 33. Bethsura. Cp. iv. 29. 34. he fortified Joppa. Cp. xii. 33, 34. ; ; ᾿ Gazara ... upon the borders of Azotus. Cp. xili. 43-8. This is a mistake as Gazara was 17 miles distan…
- Source
- R. H. Charles, ed., 1913 — Internet Archive
- Rights
- Public-domain-era 1913 edition; unrestricted Internet Archive derivative required
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.