Ante-Nicene Fathers — Vol. 06 — CCEL UTF-8 text — [3389] Supply, "do you pursue Him so fiercely?"
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Ante-Nicene Fathers — Volume 6
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_fd9c98d3-279c-4e50-b205-93de707be115This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 6
[3390] These words are followed in the edition of Gelenius by ch. 2-5 of the second book, seemingly without any mark to denote transposition; while Ursinus inserted the same chapters--beginning, however, with the last sentence of the first chapter (read as mentioned in the note on it)--but prefixed an asterisk, to mark a departure from the order of the ms. The later editors have not adopted either change. __________________________________________________________________
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — ANF06 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.