Ante-Nicene Fathers — Vol. 06 — CCEL UTF-8 text — Section 2086
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Ante-Nicene Fathers — Volume 6
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_61a7cd11-d4f6-4b89-9070-85b8fba2c8eaThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 6
[4871] Lit., "more prompt to lust of hurting." [4872] Lit., "nature of hurting." [4873] The ms. reads ad ea quæ facti sunt, understood seemingly as above by the edd., by supplying ad before quæ. Oehler, however, proposes quia--"because they were made for them." The reading must be regarded as doubtful. [4874] i.e., if sacrifices avail to counteract the malevolent dispositions of the gods. [4875] Lit., "these." This clause, omitted by Oberthür, is also omitted without remark by Orelli. __________________________________________________________________
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — ANF06 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.