Ante-Nicene Fathers — Vol. 06 — CCEL UTF-8 text — [1639] The text is "Sicut autem ante," etc. Routh suggests, Sole adeunte, etc.
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Ante-Nicene Fathers — Volume 6
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_61a58ad8-a44f-4703-9d93-2cd0b32bdb36This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 6
[1640] Reading "ex æquo et justo, solis fulgore," etc. The Codex Casinensis has "ex ea quo solis fulgure." [1641] The text is altogether corrupt--sed non intui hunc fieri ratus sum; so that the sense can only be guessed at. Routh suggests istud for intui. [1642] Codex Casinensis gives "omni nisi," for which we adopt "omni nisu." __________________________________________________________________
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — ANF06 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.