Nicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 06 — Section 1260
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Volume 6
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_8d69a4e5-54cf-4e53-94dc-c5cef53a12e1This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series Vol. 6
20. L. Were Arians really then received after all? Pray tell me who they were. O. [4126] Eusebius, bishop of Nicomedia, [4127] Theognis, bishop of Nicæa, Saras, at the time presbyter of Libya, [4128] Eusebius, bishop of Cæsarea in Palestine, and others whom it would be tedious to enumerate; Arius also, the presbyter, the original source of all the trouble; Euzoius the deacon, [4129] who succeeded Eudoxius as bishop of Antioch, and Achillas, the reader. These three who were clerics of the Church of Alexandria were the originators of the heresy.
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — NPNF2-06 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.