Nicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 03 — Chapter XC.
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Volume 3
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_b64fc4dd-ee22-4ad3-baaa-8e0625daa6f0This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series Vol. 3
Theodorus, [2516] bishop of Heraclea in Thrace, published in the reign of the emperor Constantius commentaries On Matthew and John, On the Epistles and On the Psalter. These are written in a polished and clear style and show an excellent historical sense. __________________________________________________________________ [2516] Bishop 335, died 355? __________________________________________________________________
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — NPNF2-03 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.