Nicene & Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Vol. 03 — 17. If we may allege falsification at every turn we make a chaos of all past literature.
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers — Second Series Volume 3
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_6cf17390-e164-44eb-b2ff-2ba8d839a917This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series Vol. 3
18. The object of Origen's letter, of which he translates only a part, is not to shew the falsification of his writings but to vituperate the Bishops who condemned him. 19. It is only in reference to a particular point in his dispute with Candidus that Origen alleges this falsification. The story of Hilary's being condemned through his writings having been falsified has no foundation.
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — NPNF2-03 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.