Ante-Nicene Fathers — Vol. 02 — CCEL UTF-8 text — Section 1184
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Ante-Nicene Fathers — Volume 2
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_f3b54bce-9c07-47ad-ab16-9f2c6358aa6dThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 2
And did not the Lord make all things by the Word? Even the beasts work, driven by compelling fear. And do not those who are called orthodox apply themselves to good works, knowing not what they do? __________________________________________________________________ [1894] The empirics were a class of physicians who held practice to be the one thing essential. [1895] Prov. xxii. 20, 21. The Septuagint and Hebrew both differ from the reading here. [1896] John. i. 3. __________________________________________________________________
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — ANF02 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.