Ante-Nicene Fathers — Vol. 02 — CCEL UTF-8 text — Section 2218
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Ante-Nicene Fathers — Volume 2
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_f25f6992-1b24-4994-aeba-b9e0abad99e3This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 2
"Marcus, my son, saluteth you." [3749] Mark, the follower of Peter, while Peter publicly preached the Gospel at Rome before some of Cæsar's equites, and adduced many testimonies to Christ, in order that thereby they might be able to commit to memory what was spoken, of what was spoken by Peter, wrote entirely what is called the Gospel according to Mark. As Luke also may be recognised [3750] by the style, both to have composed the Acts of the Apostles, and to have translated Paul's Epistle to the Hebrews. II.--Comments on the Epistle of Jude.
- Source
- Christian Classics Ethereal Library — ANF02 UTF-8 text
- Rights
- Administrator-authorized historic edition; CCEL electronic text. Preserve source attribution and upstream reuse terms.
- Reading language
- English
- Completeness
- Not established for this edition
- Review
- Review status not established by this card
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.