Targums Onkelos / Pseudo-Jonathan / Jerusalem Fragments — Etheridge — Section 47
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_39a19e56-e0b7-4bd3-80a1-f8c8c88d8a49This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Etheridge 1862 — retained OCR sections
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
These piacular sacrifices were of three kinds. 1. The oLaH, falil, or “ whole burnt offering,” because wholly consumed, and sent up, by the action of fire, in the flame and smoke of the altar. Olah, Chal., alatha, comes from alah, “to ascend;” LXNX., 6 זט 0 “holocaust,” a term which refers to the entire consump- tion of the victim. 2. The cHatraan, or “sin offer- ing ;” the same word signifying “sin ;” Chal., chattatha ; Sept., auapria, i.e., mept duaptias. 38. The asHax, or “trespass offering,” from ashmah, “to be guilty ;” Chal., ashama; Sept., 4₪סט0 cwrnpiov, “ the sacrifice of…
- Source
- The Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch : with the fragments of the Jerusalem Targum from the Chaldee
- Rights
- Public domain
- Reading language
- eng
- Source language
- eng
- Completeness
- Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED
- Review
- Unverified edition; not Human Sealed
Recorded provenance: Byte-for-byte projection of approved legacy passage text into separate native OCR edition; original legacy passages and raw upstream source unchanged.
External AI use is not authorized for this edition. Preparing a question does not submit its text to a provider.
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.