Targums Onkelos / Pseudo-Jonathan / Jerusalem Fragments — Etheridge — Section 310
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_334a6395-0b18-4762-a192-18ffdb1c8e07This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Etheridge 1862 — retained OCR sections
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
These (are they whom) Mosheh and Elazar the priest numbered of the sons of Israel, in the plains of Moab, by Jordan, (over against) Jericho. Dut among these there was not a man of them whom Mosheh and Aharon the pricst numbered when they counted the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai. For the Lord had said to them that dying they should die in the wilder- ness; and not aman of them remained, except Kaleb bar Jephuneh and Jehoshua bar Nun. AXVII. And the daughters of Zelophechad bar Hepher, bar Gilead, bar Makir, bar Menasheh, of the families of Menasheh, bar Joseph,—and t…
- Source
- The Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch : with the fragments of the Jerusalem Targum from the Chaldee
- Rights
- Public domain
- Reading language
- eng
- Source language
- eng
- Completeness
- Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED
- Review
- Unverified edition; not Human Sealed
Recorded provenance: Byte-for-byte projection of approved legacy passage text into separate native OCR edition; original legacy passages and raw upstream source unchanged.
External AI use is not authorized for this edition. Preparing a question does not submit its text to a provider.
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.