Targums Onkelos / Pseudo-Jonathan / Jerusalem Fragments — Etheridge — Section 6
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_3270b63d-6dd8-40fb-809f-deab22b208ffThis identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Etheridge 1862 — retained OCR sections
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
Gods were revealed to him.” See also Gen. xxxi. 53.)! When we read in some royal proclamation such words as, “ We have decreed,” the form of the pronoun being usual on the lips of a king makes no hindrance to our perception that the words are those of an individual ; but when we read, “The kings have decreed,” we are obliged, by the common sense of language, to understand more kings than one. But such is the combination of the nominative and the verb in the texts just cited. The Bible, did it contain no other intimation on the mystery of the Triune Nature, by combining this plural ua…
- Source
- The Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch : with the fragments of the Jerusalem Targum from the Chaldee
- Rights
- Public domain
- Reading language
- eng
- Source language
- eng
- Completeness
- Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED
- Review
- Unverified edition; not Human Sealed
Recorded provenance: Byte-for-byte projection of approved legacy passage text into separate native OCR edition; original legacy passages and raw upstream source unchanged.
External AI use is not authorized for this edition. Preparing a question does not submit its text to a provider.
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.