Targums Onkelos / Pseudo-Jonathan / Jerusalem Fragments — Etheridge — Section 16
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_2bcc75ee-64ce-4d28-ac11-066a5e4e9617This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Etheridge 1862 — retained OCR sections
Excerpt · the full reading remains in Scripture Library.
places it generally wants the final aleph: memr, “a word,” sermo, oratzo, like pithgama or milla in Chaldee. 2. It is used with the import of an emphatic pronoun. Thus, memri, “my word,” equivalent to “I myself; ” memreka, “thou thyself;” memrieh, “he himself.” Example: “There is a covenant between me and thee.” Kayema bein memri uvein memrika. So Gen. xxvi. 3: “T will be with thee.” Targ.: Ve yehe memri be sahduk : “ And My word,” i. ¢., I Myself, “ will be thy helper.” 3. Asa personal appellation, intensifying the idea of personality. Itis then Jfemra da Yeya, “the Word of the Lor…
- Source
- The Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan ben Uzziel on the Pentateuch : with the fragments of the Jerusalem Targum from the Chaldee
- Rights
- Public domain
- Reading language
- eng
- Source language
- eng
- Completeness
- Existing approved legacy passages only; completeness against full historical work UNVERIFIED
- Review
- Unverified edition; not Human Sealed
Recorded provenance: Byte-for-byte projection of approved legacy passage text into separate native OCR edition; original legacy passages and raw upstream source unchanged.
External AI use is not authorized for this edition. Preparing a question does not submit its text to a provider.
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.