Abarbanel on Torah, Numbers 11:1:6
The reading, its source, and a dependable way back.
Work: Abarbanel on Torah
Permanent passage identifier
hsu_85423ea1-e6ca-4044-9340-cd3682322378This identity belongs to this edition’s reading. Cross-witness correspondence awaits review.
Abarbanel on Torah — Sefaria Community Translation
The fifth question arises from the phrase, 'And Moses heard the people weeping, each clan apart, because of their families.' (Numbers 11:10) The question is that Rashi's explanation is not sufficient, as it suggests that they were crying over forbidden relationships. This is unlikely because when one desires to satisfy his hunger, he does not cry over the lack of delicacies. These are changing desires, and the Torah does not respond to this.
- Source
- Abarbanel on Torah — Sefaria Community Translation
- Rights
- Public domain
- Reading language
- eng
- Source language
- eng
- Completeness
- PARTIAL: all supplied nonempty community English leaves only; many Hebrew sections have no English counterpart.
- Review
- Unverified edition; not Human Sealed
Recorded provenance: Exact Sefaria export verified against native existing exact-version rights evidence. Original raw JSON retained immutable. Native WordPress markup removal and two-newline separators form body projection.
Work translation availability: HSLT — No published edition · HSRT — No published edition. A translation of this Work may not cover this exact passage.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.