Helpful Saints Corpus Reader
Apocalypse of Elijah Traditions (Earlier / Patristic References)
Earlier Apocalypse of Elijah traditions — James 1920 fragments and notes
Unverified edition · Scanned section 71
Reading language: eng · Original language (catalog): Uncertain; references and proposed relationships involve Greek and later transmission
Reading display
Display preferences stay on this browser when storage is available.
Resume in the Library keeps only your last public work, edition and passage on this browser.
Saved Places
Saved only on this browser. Places do not synchronize between devices. Only work, edition and passage identifiers are kept; passage text is not stored.
Remove all Saved Places from this browser? Resume reading and display preferences will stay.
Scanned section 71 · All reading sections
Choose an edition
James1920 historical fragment dossier, printedpage 53
Elijah. Apocalypse EUas. The list of the Sixty Books speaks of the Apocalvpse of E/ias. The other two have simply " Of Elias the Prophet." The Latin version of the sticho- metry, by Anastasius Bibliothecarius, renders " Prophecy of Elias." The Armenian has " The Mystx^ries of Elias." The stichometry gives it 316 lines. To this book, two passages in St. Paul's Epistles are referred. The first is i Cor. ii. 9 : " Eye hath not seen," etc. Origin {on Malt, xxvii. 9) says : " This is found in no canonical book, but in the apocrypha {in secrclis) of Elias." Jerome (Ep. loi to Pammachius), with his eye on Origen, no doubt, writes : " In this place some will follow after the drivellings of apocryphal wiitings and say that the quotation is taken from the Apocalypse of Elias, whereas we read thus in Isaiah according to the Hebrew, ' From everlasting they have not heard,' etc. (Isa. Ixiv. 4)." And again, in his great commentary on Isaiah (lib. xvii.) he fulminates against this view, contorting Ps. x. 3, and making it say " the devil lies in wait in the Apocrypha," after which he adds, " for the Ascension of Isaiah and the Apocalypse of Elias have this quotation." The truth about the quotation seems to be (as Mr. H. St. J. Thackeray has shown in St. Paul and Con- temporary Jewish Thought, p. 240) that it was a blend
Study this passage
Compare this section in another edition
Read the editions separately. Matching section labels do not establish word or phrase alignment.
Only publicly readable editions are offered. An original-language parallel requires an admitted source edition; a retained private witness is not displayed here.
About this edition
Recorded completeness: James1920 earlier testimonia and fragments, printed53–59: historical quoted material, Latinfragment/Greekfragment and comparative Antichrist descriptions with James’s uncertainty. Not the completeCopticApocalypse or HebrewSeferElijah; chapter portion turns to those distinct traditions after this selected boundary. Ancientquotation versus historical commentary distinguished by the source. All sourcewording, quotedlacunae and uncertainOCR retained withoutrepair.. Available reading sections are listed below.
Available body coverage · eng
7 chapter/reading unit(s) · 7 nonempty passage record(s).
Supported chapters & passages
- Scanned section 71 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 72 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 73 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 74 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 75 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 76 · 1 passage record(s)
- Scanned section 77 · 1 passage record(s)
Body coverage is separate from textual verification. Counts do not establish complete chapters or textual completeness.
Evidence Intelligence
Know what kind of evidence you are looking at.
Helpful Saints keeps direct biblical text, language evidence, ancient witnesses, historical context, research models, and open questions visibly distinct.Direct Biblical Text
The explicit wording and literary context of canonical Scripture.
Original-Language Evidence
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, morphology, lemmas, semantic range, and textual comparison.
Ancient Witness
Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish literature, and early Christian writings—clearly classified.
Historical Context
Geography, material culture, chronology ranges, institutions, customs, and reception history.
Research Model
A configured chronology, theological synthesis, typological pattern, or proposed relationship.
Open Question
Evidence is incomplete, debated, or insufficient for a settled conclusion.